Jump to Content
Adjust font size:
small fonts normal fonts large fonts largest fonts

Monitoring Report No. 1

Anthony Carlson
Sea, Air and Safety Branch
27 April 1998

Introduction

In August 1996, the then Commonwealth Minister for Transport and Regional Development announced the introduction of the Bass Strait Passenger Vehicle Equalisation Scheme (the Scheme), effective from 1 September 1996. The Scheme provides a rebate against the fare charged by a ferry operator to transport a driver plus passenger vehicle by sea across Bass Strait, and gives effect to the Government's election commitment to provide a rebate of up to $300 for a return trip.

The Scheme operates under a set of Ministerial Directions and is administered by the Commonwealth's Tasmanian Assistance Team in Hobart. Although the Scheme was originally overseen by the Department of Transport and Regional Development's (DoTRD) Maritime Division, new administrative arrangements in October 1997 resulted in the maritime functions of DoTRD being taken over by the Department of Workplace Relations and Small Business. Since then a new set of Directions have been approved by the Minister for Workplace Relations and Small Business. This report reflects the administrative arrangements in place during the monitoring period (1 September 1996 to 30 June 1997).

Clause 16 of the Directions (attachment I) provides for the annual monitoring of the effectiveness of the Scheme by the Bureau of Transport and Communications Economics. In considering the Scheme's effectiveness, it is appropriate to take into account the aim of the Scheme, which is simply stated as "to reduce the cost of seagoing travel for an eligible passenger" (clause 2.1). However, comments made by the then Minister at the time of the announcement of the Scheme suggest an additional aim of helping the Tasmanian tourism industry in particular, and the Tasmanian economy as a whole (Sharp 1996). Therefore, the effectiveness of the Scheme would depend on:

  • the extent eligible passengers benefited from lower net fares;
  • changes in eligible passenger demand, and in the demand of those accompanying eligible passengers, as a result of lower net fares;
  • changes in unit operating costs to the service operator and the degree any savings are passed onto all passengers through lower gross fares; and
  • the resulting change in total demand for passengers travelling across Bass Strait, including travel by air, and the origin of this traffic.

This is the first monitoring report and only covers the first 10 months of the Scheme's operation (1 September 1996 to 30 June 1997). Consequently, this report provides only an initial indication of the overall effectiveness of the Scheme. At this stage it is too early to provide a conclusive analysis of the effectiveness of the Scheme.


Overview of the Scheme

Calculation of the rebate

The rebate is calculated on the basis of charging a net fare for an eligible passenger vehicle plus driver, travelling in standard share cabin accommodation, that is comparable to the notional cost of driving an equivalent distance on a highway.

The equivalent highway cost is based upon the sea distance of 427 kilometres between the ports of Devonport and Melbourne multiplied by an estimated running cost for an average family saloon (39.87 cents per kilometre). This provides an equivalent highway cost of $170 for a one-way trip.

For the purposes of the rebate calculation, the fare for an "inside cabin" on the Spirit of Tasmania is used as the passenger fare benchmark. This accommodation represents approximately 50 per cent of the berths available on the Spirit of Tasmania. The benchmark passenger vehicle fare has been based upon the fare for a passenger vehicle of no more than five metres in length.

Due to the seasonal nature of demand, both the passenger and vehicle fares vary according to three seasons (high, shoulder and off peak seasons). Consequently, the rebate varies with the largest rebate being applied during the high season and smallest rebate being applied during the off season, to provide an approximation of the equivalent highway cost across all seasons. The rebates applied for the monitoring period are provided in table 1.

Table 1 Round trip rebate for a driver travelling with a motor car, bus, or motor cycle, 1 september 1996 to 30 june 1997

Eligible vehicle Off Peak Season(1 Sep 96 - 27 Sep 96)(13 Apr 97 - 30 Jun 97) Shoulder Season(28 Sep 96 - 13 Dec 96)(26 Jan 97 - 12 Apr 97) High Season(14 Dec 96 - 25 Jan 97)
Motor car or bus $200 $240 $300
Motor cycle $100 $120 $150

Note: The rebate for a one way trip is 50 per cent of the rebate for a round trip. Where a round trip consists of northbound and southbound legs in different seasons, the booking is, for the purposes of determining a rebate, considered as consisting of two one way trips. (Source DoTRD 1996)


The rebate for a one-way trip is 50 per cent of the rebate for a round trip. The value of the rebate is reviewed each year by the Minister.

Method of payment

The rebate is an 'up front' subsidy. That is, the rebate is provided to the driver of an eligible passenger vehicle as a reduction in the fare charged by the relevant service operator. The onus is on the service operator to determine the eligibility of the passenger for the rebate, apply the rebate to the passenger's gross fare, and claim reimbursement of the rebate from the Commonwealth. Clause 9.3 of the Directions limits the service operator to no more than one claim a month, while clause 9.4 allows the service operator to claim reimbursement:

  1. for an eligible passenger who has travelled within the previous 12 months; and
  2. subject to clause 10, where an eligible passenger has not yet travelled, but has booked and paid for travel to be undertaken during the period for which the claim is made, for that passenger.

The Directions made provisions (clause 8) for passengers who had booked and paid for their travel prior to the introduction of the Scheme, for travel after 1 September 1996, to be forwarded a cheque for the appropriate rebate.

Funding for the scheme is demand-driven and changes to match the actual level of eligible passenger vehicle travel undertaken. Funding for 1996-97 was originally estimated at $7.5m based upon the carriage of an estimated 68,000 passenger vehicles during the first 10 months of the Scheme's operation. A total of nearly $8.5m in rebates was paid during 1996-97 in respect of the carriage of 73,360 passenger vehicles.

New operators

The Scheme does not discriminate between service operators. Should a new operator enter the Bass Strait passenger trade, the Scheme applies to its passengers on the same basis as those of existing service operators. That is, the rebate applicable to each season, and the dates of the seasons, remain unchanged for any new operator. This arrangement is intended to provide certainty in the market place as to how the Scheme will apply.


Payments Made Under The Scheme

Service operators

During the monitoring period, there were two operators carrying passengers and their vehicles between Tasmania and the mainland: TT Line with the Spirit of Tasmania; and Southern Shipping with the much smaller ferry Matthew Flinders. The Spirit of Tasmania operates between Devonport and Melbourne, while the Matthew Flinders operates services between Bridport (Tasmania) and Welshpool (Victoria) via Flinders and Deal Islands. Since eligible passengers using Southern Shipping received rebates totalling only $1080 over the monitoring period, this report focuses on the operations of TT Line.

Payments made to TT Line

For the period September 1996 to June 1997, $8.47 million was paid by the Commonwealth to TT Line, for 73360 eligible vehicles. Of these vehicles, the vast majority (95 per cent) were motor cars, 4.5 per cent were motor cycles and less than one per cent were buses (see table 2).

Figure 1 shows the number of eligible motor cars by direction and indicates the seasonal nature of the demand for ferry passage across Bass Strait. In most instances, the split between north and south bound flows is roughly even. However, there was greater demand for southbound voyages in September 1996 (60:40), and for northbound voyages in May to June 1997 (between 60:40 and 55:45).

Table 2 Payments made under the scheme to TT Line, September 1996 to june 1997

  Motor Cars Buses Motor Cycles
Month Number Rebate paid ($) Number Rebate paid ($) Number Rebate paid ($) Total rebate paid ($)
September 5558 566060 9 900 89 4530 571490
October 6451 774120 27 3240 281 16860 794220
November 6771 812520 26 3120 271 16260 831900
December 7459 1026960 12 1620 249 17250 1045830
January 8144 1177950 15 2160 323 23115 1203225
February 6842 821040 37 4440 501 30060 855540
March 7436 892320 41 4920 810 48600 945840
April 7411 801500 43 4680 584 33640 839820
May 6874 687400 25 2500 116 5800 695700
June 6865 686500 7 700 83 4150 691350
Total 69811 8246370 242 28280 3307 200265 8474915

Note An additional $1080 in rebates to Southern Shipping were made in the same period. (Source Tasmanian Assistance Team)


Figure 1 Directional Flow of Eligible Motor Cars, September 1996 to June 1997

Source Tasmanian Assistance Team

The seasonal nature of demand, combined with the higher rebates being provided for peak season travel, results in significant variation in total payments made under the Scheme on a monthly basis (figure 2).


Figure 2 Payments made to TT Line, September 1996 to June 1997

Source Tasmanian Assistance Team

Effectiveness of the scheme

To determine the effectiveness of the Scheme this analysis considered the following:

  • changes in gross fares;
  • changes in the number of eligible passenger vehicles and number of passengers accompanying those vehicles;
  • TT Line's operating performance; and
  • changes in the total demand for passenger travel across Bass Strait, including by air.

Changes in Gross Fares

Effective from 26 January 1997, TT Line increased fares by an average of 5.3 per cent, representing the first general price increase since 1994 (TT Line 1997). Table 3 indicates that for an adult inside cabin fare (on which the rebate is partly based), the fare increase was slightly above average for the shoulder season, and slightly below average for the off peak and peak season.

Table 3 also indicates that for the standard car fare (on which the rebate is partly based), there were no price increases for any season. The most significant changes in the TT Line fare schedule were for a standard car towing a trailer or caravan where total length is greater than 5 metres and height is under 2.25 metres (table 3). TT Line management informed the BTCE that these changes reflect the company's attempt to receive a more appropriate level of revenue for the additional space that such vehicles occupy. For example, the fare increases are limited in the main to the shoulder and peak seasons, times when space is at a premium.

While there has been an increase in gross fares, eligible passengers still derive a significant fare saving as a result of the rebate.

table 3 Selected tt line fares, one way, as at 26 Junuary 1997

    Shoulder season Off peak season Peak season
    New increase New increase New increase
Fare Length fare ($) $ % fare ($) $ % fare $ $ %
Adult, inside cabin na 153 8 5.5 147 7 5.0 168 8 5.0
Standard car under 2.25m in height
  5m or less 145 0 0 125 0 0 185 0 0
Standard car towing a trailer or caravan, both vehicles under 2.25m in height
  8m or less 362 30 9.0 257 0 0 422 60 16.6
  9m or less 411 40 10.8 301 0 0 486 80 19.7
  10m or less 400 50 14.3 345 0 0 555 100 22.0
  11m or less 509 60 13.4 389 44 12.8 614 120 24.3

*na=not applicable (Source TT Line fare schedule, effective 26 January 1997.)


Effect on Vehicle Numbers

During the 1996/97 financial year, TT Line carried 80642 vehicles of all types, representing an increase of 28 per cent on the previous 12 months. The change in the number of motor cars in the same period was 31 per cent. This increase in traffic was partly due to an increase in the number of voyages made by the Spirit of Tasmania in the 1996/97 financial year (313 compared with 295 in 1995/96). Nevertheless, on a per voyage basis, there was an increase of 20.7 per cent and 23.9 per cent in the number of vehicles (freight excluded) and passenger motor cars, respectively, carried by TT Line.

On a monthly basis, there was a substantial increase in the number of motor cars carried in May and June 1997 compared with the same time in the previous year (table 4). While this is significant, it is too early to tell whether this represents an ongoing trend.

Table 4 Vehicles1 carried by TT Line, 1995/96 - 1996/97

  All vehicles Motor cars
Month 1995/96 1996/97 Change (%) 1995/96 1996/97 Change (%)
July 3512 3868 10.1 3441 3797 10.3
August 2786 3773 35.4 2721 3655 34.3
September 4865 5657 16.3 4748 5559 17.1
October 5503 6759 22.8 5234 6451 23.3
November 5277 7066 33.9 4983 6769 35.8
December 5781 7717 33.5 5494 7456 35.7
January 7466 8484 13.6 7052 8146 15.5
February 6449 7377 14.4 5737 6839 19.2
March 7349 8286 12.8 5579 7435 33.3
April 6126 7907 29.1 5922 7280 22.9
May 4209 6872 63.3 4055 6731 66.0
June 3631 6871 89.2 3544 6781 91.3
Total 62954 80637 28.1 58510 76899 31.4
per voyage 213 258 20.7 198 246 23.9

1. Vehicles all types, freight excluded.

2. In addition to the 76899 motor cars carried by TT Line in 1996/97, 353 motor cars were carried by Coastal Express on behalf of TT Line. TT Line received a rebate under the Scheme for these vehicles.

3. Comparing tables 2 and 4 indicates that TT Line received a rebate for 11 motor cars which it appears it did not carry. The reason for this discrepancy is that table 4 is based on TT Line's yield management database which will vary on a month to month basis with the actual number of motor vehicles carried and claimed against as shown in table 2.

Source TT Line yield management database

Two other points should be made:

  • the relatively smaller increase in traffic in January is partly to do with that month already representing the peak period of demand, with capacity constraints limiting potential increases in demand; and
  • although August had a large relative increase in traffic (before the Scheme came into effect), it was from the smallest base of all months.

Effect on Passenger Movements

During the 1996/97 financial year, 259169 passengers were carried on the Spirit of Tasmania. This was a 20 per cent increase on the previous year. Table 5, provides a break down of passenger numbers based on TT Line's yield management database.

Of all passengers carried by TT Line in 1996/97, 35 per cent were berth only passengers, while 63 per cent were drivers or passengers of a motor car being carried by TT Line. The remaining passengers were those drivers or passengers of vehicles other than motor cars. This compares to a 39:58 split in the previous year.

Table 5 Passengers carried by TT Line, 1995/96 - 1996/97

  Total passengers Berth only passengers Motor car passengers
Month 1995/96 1996/97 Change (%) 1995/96 1996/97 Change (%) 1995/96 1996/97 Change (%)
July 13544 15766 16.4 6252 8239 31.8 7199 7440 3.3
August 8260 16150 95.5 2943 9135 210.4 5245 6864 30.9
September 18288 19239 5.2 7713 7109 -7.8 10411 12012 15.4
October 20969 20299 -3.2 9544 6978 -26.9 11038 12901 16.9
November 19748 21530 9.0 9608 7991 -16.8 9739 13166 35.2
December 21214 24262 14.4 8039 7100 -11.7 12833 16835 31.2
January 26235 28504 8.6 7296 7341 0.6 18392 20688 12.5
February 20702 21876 5.7 8222 7279 -11.5 11498 13912 21.0
March 22553 25575 13.4 8580 9065 5.7 11419 15333 34.3
April 20000 24591 23.0 6732 7866 16.8 12997 15833 21.8
May 12235 21478 75.5 4377 7626 74.2 7670 13663 78.1
June 11970 20253 69.2 4957 6006 21.2 6889 14143 105.3
Total 215718 259523 20.3 84263 91735 8.9 125330 162790 29.9
per voyage 731 829 13.4 286 293 2.6 425 520 22.4

Source TT Line yield management database

On a per voyage basis, TT Line carried 13.4 per cent more passengers in 1996/97. However, there was only a 2.6 per cent increase in berth only passengers compared with an increase of 22.4 per cent in motor car passengers. Indeed, much of the growth in berth only passenger traffic was due to an extraordinary increase in traffic during August. Figure 3 indicates that much of the increase in motor car passenger traffic from September (when the Scheme was introduced) to February may represent a transfer of demand from berth only passengers.

It should be noted that, during 1996/97, the Tasmanian Government provided $350,000 for a $30 discount in the off-peak APEX fare for both Tasmanian and mainland passengers. All 11,666 tickets were sold, which may help explain some of the growth in passenger numbers in the May to June 1997 period.

Figure 3 Percentage Change in Passenger Movements, 1995/96 - 1996/97

Source TT Line yield management database

Using the vehicle numbers in table 4, table 6 indicates that, although there has been substantial variation in the simple average number of motor car passengers per motor car on a month to month basis, the annual average (based on the average for each voyage) has not changed significantly.

Table 6 number of car passengers per car, 1995/96 - 1996/97

Car passenger per car
Month 1995/96 1996/97 Percentage change
July 2.1 2.0 -6.3
August 1.9 1.9 -2.6
September 2.2 2.2 -1.5
October 2.1 2.0 -5.2
November 2.0 1.9 -0.5
December 2.3 2.3 -3.3
January 2.6 2.5 -2.6
February 2.0 2.0 1.5
March 2.0 2.1 0.8
April 2.2 2.2 -0.9
May 1.9 2.0 7.3
June 1.9 2.1 7.3
Annual average1 2.10 2.09 -0.5

1. Average of car passengers per motor car for each voyage. Calculated t-statistic (0.74) indicates no significant difference in the average for the two years. (Source TT Line yield management database)


It is too early to determine the full impact of the Scheme on the demand for sea travel across Bass Strait. However, in the first ten months of the Scheme, there have been significant increases in both the number of vehicles, particularly motor cars, and passengers accompanying motor cars, carried by TT Line. At the same time, the number of berth only passengers carried by TT Line increased by approximately 2.6 per cent. It is reasonable to assume that this increase in demand should be reflected in higher vessel utilisation rates, resulting in lower per unit operating costs for TT Line.


TT Line's Operating Performance

Operating Costs

TT Line's operating costs in 1996/97 amounted to $51.2 million. This was a 6 per cent increase on the previous financial year (table 7). However, there were 18 more voyages by the Spirit of Tasmania in 1996/97 (313 compared with 295 in 1995/96). Consequently, on a per voyage basis, operating costs remained steady. This was due to reductions in hotel and freight services, sales and holiday packages, and head office costs being offset by increases in human resources and reservations costs, and commissions and fees.

Table 7 TT Line operating expenditure, 1995-1997

  Expenditure ($'000s) Change Expenditure Change
  1995/96 1996/97 (%) 1995/96 1996/97 (%)
Expenditure by department
Operations 21198 22357 5 71858 71428 -1
Hotel services 14565 15296 5 49373 48869 -1
Customer services 4693 4893 4 15908 15633 -2
Administration 5697 6098 7 19312 19482 1
Other expenditure
Commissions and fees            
Passenger 1579 1904 21 5353 6083 14
Vehicle 521 631 21 1766 2016 14
Total 48253 51179 6 163569 163511 0

Note Operating expenditures are shown by profit centre. In some cases, expenditure on one particular item may be distributed among a number of profit centres. (Source TT Line financial reports)


Operating Revenue

Table 8 indicates that TT Line earned $64.1 million in revenue in 1996/97. This was a 16 per cent increase on the previous financial year. On a per voyage basis, operating revenue increased 9 per cent, reflecting an increase in fares in January 1997, and higher passenger and vehicle occupancy rates. However, some of the increase in vehicle numbers was offset by a reduction in freight capacity and this is reflected in reduced freight revenues.

Table 9 considers TT Line's operating costs and revenues in terms of the output of its three core services: passengers, vehicles and freight. The table shows that TT Line was able to increase its per unit return in all three services, principally from reduced passenger and freight unit costs, and increased vehicle unit revenues. The latter reflects a change in company pricing policy towards vehicles towing trailers or caravans, and oversized vehicles.

Table 8 tt Line operating revenue

  Revenue ($000) Change Revenue per voyage ($) Change
Revenue source 1995/96 1996/97 (%) 1995/96 1996/97 (%)
Passenger 19934 29398 47 67571 93925 39
Vehicle 9126 12356 35 30936 39476 28
Freight 17796 17050 -4 60324 54473 -10
On board food & beverage 6847 2891 -58 23210 9238 -60
Franchise 409 497 22 1387 1589 15
Cruise 423 674 60 1432 2154 50
Other 159 660 315 539 2109 291
Holiday packages 552 581 5 1872 1856 -1
Gain (loss) sale fixed assets -9 -18 106 -30 -58 94
Total operating revenue 55237 64091 16 187242 204762 9

Figures may not add due to rounding. (Source TT Line financial reports)


This pricing change (as discussed earlier, see table 3) coincided with an average 5.3 per cent increase in passenger fares. However, table 9 indicates there was only a slight (less than 1 per cent) increase in actual passenger revenues. This discrepancy can be explained by figure 4 which indicates that there was a substantial increase in the proportion of various discounted fares compared with all fares, for the off peak season. Although information on the size of each discount per ticket is not available, it does appear that any increases in revenue obtained from higher published fares have been offset by greater discounting in the off peak season. Whether or not the increased discounting is an indirect result of the Scheme is too difficult to determine at this early stage.

It should also be noted that the apparent 'increase' in passenger fares shown in table 9 is partly the result of an earlier change in pricing policy by TT Line. From 26 August 1996, passengers received a buffet meal and continental breakfast as part of the standard fare. This resulted in an increase in fare revenue but was offset by a reduction in revenue from on-board food and beverage consumption.

Table 9 TT line operating costs and revenues by service type

Passengers 1995/96 1996/97 Vehicles 1995/96 1996/97
Passengers carried 215974 259169 Vehicles carried 62933 80642
Revenue ($000) Revenue ($000) 9126 12356
Fares 19934 29398
On board food & beverage 6847 2891
Total passenger revenue 26780 32290
Revenue per passenger ($) 124 125 Revenue per vehicle ($) 145 153
Costs ($000) Costs ($000)
Hotel services 14565 15296 Commissions and fees 521 631
Commissions and fees 1579 1904 Other 4587 5758
Other 10018 13699
Total passenger costs 26162 30899 Total vehicle costs 5108 6388
Costs per passenger ($) 121 119 Costs per vehicle ($) 81 79
Return per passenger ($) 3 5 Return per vehicle ($) 64 74
Freight
Number of TEUs 23200 22112
Revenue ($000) 17796 17050
Revenue per TEU ($) 767 771
Costs ($000)
Freight services 7160 7201
Other 8944 7945
Total freight costs 16103 15146
Freight costs per TEU ($) 694 685
Return per TEU ($) 73 86

Note The "other" costs category was determined by apportioning total costs, less those costs already noted, by the contribution each service makes to total revenue. (Source TT Line Financial Report)


Since the introduction of the Scheme, TT Line has improved its financial position and TT Line management has acknowledged that the Scheme has made a substantial contribution to the company's positive financial performance (TT Line 1997). It also appears that the increase in demand as a result of the Scheme has lead to lower unit operating costs for TT Line, and it is possible that some of the benefits of these lower costs have been passed on to some passengers through discounted fares.

Figure 4 Percentage Change in the Proportion of Discount Fares to Full Fares, 1995/96 - 1996/97

Source TT Line yield management database

Changes in Air Passenger Movements Across the Bass Strait

The reduction in the cost to travel across Bass Strait by sea may have resulted in some consumers switching from air to sea travel. But, at first glance, there has been little effect on total passenger numbers using air services between the mainland and Tasmania, since the Scheme came into effect (AVSTATS, see figure 5). Although much of the May 1996 to April 1997 data (the most recent data available) are provisional or estimates, it seems that traffic flows during this period are roughly in line with passenger movements in the preceding 12 months.

However, this general picture hides changes in passenger movements into and out of Devonport and Burnie for the same period. For example, figure 6 shows how the number of passengers travelling by air between Devonport and Melbourne/Moorabbin for the August to November 1996 period was substantially down on that period in the preceding year. This decline in passenger numbers is particularly so for the period corresponding with the introduction of the Scheme. Although Tourism Tasmania was able to confirm that one airline had commented on a downturn in business since the Scheme's introduction, Tourism Tasmania was unable to provide any additional information to confirm the type of passengers who may have switched from air transport to the ferry.

Figure 5 Number of Domestic and Regional Air Service Passenger Between Tasmania and the Mainland, Various Years1

1. Data for 1996-97 are provisional. (Source AVSTATS)

Graphic - Line Chart

Figure 6 Number of Domestic and Regional Air Service Passenger Between Melbourne/Moorabbin and Devonport, Various Years1

1. Data for 1996-97 are provisional. (Source AVSTATS)


The slight decline in the June to August period (the period immediately preceding the introduction of the Scheme) may have been due to some consumers delaying their travel in anticipation of the introduction of the Scheme, and switching to the Spirit of Tasmania when they did travel.

Although some regional airlines may believe they lost passengers to TT-Line, it is possible that little shift in modal demand occurred since total passenger numbers, rather than motor car passenger numbers, on the Spirit of Tasmania increased only slightly over the September to November period (see table 5). Additional information about changes in the demand for 'fly-drive' packages would be required if this matter were to be further investigated.

If the introduction of the Scheme did not result in consumers switching modes to cross the Bass Strait, then the matter of what caused the decline in regional air passenger demand would still need to be resolved. This is because it is possible that the factors impacting on the demand for air travel may also have been expected to impact on the demand for sea travel. If this is true, then it is possible that the effectiveness of the Scheme may be understated since sea passenger traffic actually increased.

Conclusions

Due to the limited period over which the Scheme has operated, this monitoring report finds that it is too early to draw any firm conclusions about the effectiveness of the Scheme. However, the following points are worth mentioning:

  • there has been an increase in total traffic on the Spirit of Tasmania since the commencement of the Scheme;
  • load factors (per voyage) have increased resulting in lower unit costs for TT Line; and
  • unit passenger revenues have remained roughly unchanged while unit vehicle revenues have increased by 5.5 per cent.

There is little doubt that the introduction of the Scheme has contributed to the improved financial performance of TT Line. However, it is possible that TT Line has passed on some of the indirect benefits it has derived from the Scheme through increased discounting during the off peak season.

Postscript

It does seem that the increase in demand has been sustained beyond the 1996/97 monitoring period. During the scheduled dry docking of the Spirit of Tasmania, the ferry Incat 045 operated between 13 July and 27 July 1997 (inclusive). This service enabled TT Line to trial the potential use of a high speed catamaran, resulting in TT Line's decision to use such a vessel (The Devil Cat) over the peak 1997-98 period.

References

AVSTATS, Air Transport Statistics, Department of Transport and Regional Development, Canberra.

DoTRD 1996, Directions by the Minister for Transport and Regional Development for the Operation of the Bass Strait Passenger Vehicle Equalisation Scheme, Department of Transport and Regional Development, August, Canberra.

Sharp 1996, Bass Strait Passenger Vehicle Equalisation Scheme, media statement by the Hon. John Sharp MP, Minister for Transport and Regional Development, 23 August.

NRMA 1995, What it Costs to Run Your Car, Sydney.

TT Line 1997, Annual Report for the Year Ended 30 June 1997.


Attachment 1

Clause 16 of the Minister's Directions for the OPERATION of
the Bass Strait Passenger Vehicle EQUALISATION Scheme

16.1 A Service Operator who claims reimbursement under the Scheme shall be subject to monitoring by the Bureau.

16.2 The Bureau shall, on an annual basis, monitor the effectiveness of the Scheme, with specific regard to:

(a) movement in a Service Operator's annual operating costs;

(b) movement in an Operator's revenue; and

(c) the number of eligible passengers and eligible passenger vehicles carried per annum by the Operator.

16.3 A Service Operator shall comply with all reasonable requests by the Bureau for information or access to documentation, in relation to the Bureau's monitoring function.


Print 
Last Updated: 1 August, 2008